Mary

Mary

Saturday, November 26, 2011

The Two Paths of Stem Cell Research


The Wrong Path

On November 14th Geron Corporation announced that it was no longer pursuing embryonic stem cell research and would instead focus on its oncology research.
  
"Geron is seeking partners with the technical and financial resources to enable further development of its stem cell programs."

On May 4, 2011 the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, or CIRM awarded Geron a 25 million dollar loan for a spinal cord therapy using embryonic stem cells. 

The news that Geron was ending the the trial and laying off 38% of its workforce was troubling to the supporters of embryonic stem cell research. Geron has stated that they will pay back the loan the taxpayers of California have funded.

CIRM is now placing most of its money into adult stem cell research as noted in a NY Times article. I find the following quotes from the NY Times interesting.

"The grants thus represent a departure from the program’s original mission. California voters approved the 10-year, $3 billion effort in 2004 largely to get around restrictions on embryonic stem cell research imposed by the administration of President George W. Bush.
Such research is ethically controversial because creation of embryonic stem cells involves the destruction of human embryos. This year, the Obama administration relaxed the previous administration’s restrictions."

"One project financed Wednesday would involve retrieving cardiac stem cells from a patient’s heart. The cells would be multiplied in culture and then put back into the heart to try to repair damage from a heart attack.
Dr. Eduardo Marbán of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, who will lead the project, said embryonic stem cells turn into immature heart cells that might not help an adult heart. “The last thing we want to do is grow rogue heart cells,” Dr. Marbán said."

Potential versus Function

The concern for Catholics concerning the wrong path are embryonic stem cell therapies and experimentation involve the destruction of human embryos.
There are some in the sciences that state that the embryo is not a person, or human being. If that were the case then why would human embryonic stem cells be of any value in treating human illness?
They tout the value of the human embryo because it has cells that may be of value in treating human illness, and those cells are of course human. The human embryo is a potential human being.
Those who say it is not confuse function with potential. Function is a subjective measure of a person. What function or functions will determine person hood? Will IQ determine person hood? Will the ability to speak, hear, or walk determine person hood? Will self-sufficiency determine person hood? A three-month old is not self-sufficient, does that mean the killing of a three month old would not qualify as a homicide?
The fact is that human embryonic stem cells are sought because they are human beings, if there was a chance those cells would produce an ape or a horse by the time of birth they would be of no value to the researchers.

The Right Path

The Vatican is now in a partnership with NeoStem Corporation to advance adult stem cell research. Not only is there no need to destroy human embryos but adult stem cell research is showing more promise in the treatment of disease or illness.

One article published by the Catholic News Agency contains quotes from Wesley J. Smith and Father Trafney concerning the media bias in reporting the success of adult stem cell research. I cannot speak for the media, but in general there is a bias in the media towards the Church or anyone else that holds the position that there are objective truths concerning morality and ethics. Unfortunately media bias will be immune to adult stem cell therapy.

The important story that the Church needs to tell is that the Vatican is not just saying no to one type of medical research but is actively supporting medical research that is showing more promise in developing cures than embryonic stem cell research.

I have included a list of links I used for my research in the writing of this blog.

Pax Christi     

Thursday, November 24, 2011

Physician Heal Thyself


The doctor and his conscience are in today.

Doctor John Kitzhaber has something that some taxpayers in Oregon wish they had. He has the ability to stop the laws of the State of Oregon from carrying out an action that would take someones life.
In his statement concerning the arbitrary nature of the death penalty the governor states that he prefers life in prison without the possibility of parole.
The governors request that state legislators work with him to find a solution to the death penalty would have more gravitas if he stated that he would seek to have the state constitution amended so the governor no longer had the power to pardon or commute an inmates sentence in return for the abolition of the death penalty.
The sentence of life in prison without parole is meaningless in any state that allows the governor to pardon or commute a sentence. Just as one sin does not mitigate another sin, removing one legal action that the governor deems arbitrary and not doing away with another legal action, the arbitrary governor's power to overturn a courts verdict and sentence is illogical.

The doctor and his conscience are out today.

One hopes that Governor Kitzhaber will continue to wrestle with his conscience, as should we all. So far the governor is losing his wrestling match with conscience. Some Christians make the mistake of hating the sin as well as the sinner. Doctor Kitzhaber makes the opposite mistake. Moral Relativists embrace both the sinner and the sin and the good doctor falls into the latter category. The governor finds it unconscionable that a two time murderer should lose his life at the hands of the State of Oregon, but sees no problem with the State of Oregon paying for the death of the innocent by assisted suicide and abortion on demand through the Oregon Health Plan. Taxpayers who object to assisted suicide or abortion are made to pay for these services regardless of deeply held religious beliefs. The exercise of conscience seems to be the prerogative of those who hold relativist views of truth, those that believe in objective truth are to be quiet and pay the bills.

Read More